Hillary Trounces Obama…Again…
She’s Loud, She’s Proud, and She’s Not Giving Up
We thought it was supposed be all over. After something like 10 primary wins in a row Obama was waxing Presidential. He seemed unstoppable. Michelle Obama, now proud of the “United States of Ameri-kkk-A” for the first time, seemed ready to pick out drapes for the White House.
Then America started getting a look at that man behind the curtain. And the spell was broken. Hillary began winning, and winning big. Her latest win in Kentucky was 65% to 30%. Thats more than 2 to 1. That’s huge. The few Obama has won since the content of Obama’s character began being revealed were by much smaller margins.
So I submit to the DemoRats: You have a huge problem. Look at the trends, look at the demographics, look at the big picture. You have a once-rising star, Obama, whom too many people have figured out. If this had happened earlier, I don’t think he would have won all those primaries. Now he is damaged and fading.
The Emperor indeed has no clothes. This guy cannot win in November. As bad as the Republicans have been, voters are not going to turn over both Congress and the White House to the Blame America First party, whose idea of “new solutions” includes destroying the economy with the same previously-failed policies.
Just like in 2004, when Bush was so vulnerable, and you chose Kerry. You may just be doing it again.
May 21, 2008 - 01:20 AM on May 21st, 2008
You just don’t get it, do you? Senator Obama is the only candidate that offers change, real change, change we can believe in! All of the smears, the personal attacks, the crap your side has come up are exactly what Obama is talking about when he discusses the need for change! Stop the politics of the past! Stop all this crap about his background and history! None of it matters! It doesn’t matter what church he goes to, or if he goes to church at all. Nobody cares! It is not relevant what elected positions he held in Chicago or who he counted among his many supporters. He states very clearly what his positions are, which is what he should be doing, and the fact that you cannot understand this makes you a neocon dinosaur.
Yes Hillary was our standard bearer but that was before Baraq came along with his wonderful message of hope, peace, and change. So now he is our candidate.
Change we can believe in! What about that can’t you understand?
You just can’t stand having a black man as the President, can you? Go ahead, admit it!
May 21, 2008 - 06:57 AM on May 21st, 2008
What does the color of his skin have to do with it? Isn’t he more than just a black man?
The politics of the past? You mean like his qualifications for the job? Or in Barack’s case, the lack of qualification?
May 21, 2008 - 07:35 AM on May 21st, 2008
Black man for president? No, but I would prefer a black woman like Condoleeze Rice. For those that this kind of thing matters to it means I get two for the price of one. Female and black.
Yes, I get it.
May 21, 2008 - 07:43 AM on May 21st, 2008
Barack Obama: Gaffe machine
May 21, 2008 - 08:12 AM on May 21st, 2008
That reminds me of how George Allen was hounded out of the race early by the MSM for one statement, the “macaca” thing. He should have been the Republican nominee instead of McCain. But the MSM took care of that.
Yet Obama gets a perpetual free pass. He can put both feet in his mouth and they don’t even notice.
And DA, you are clearly another one of Obama’s sycophants, an Obamaic, a self-deluded fool.
May 21, 2008 - 08:28 AM on May 21st, 2008
“What does the color of his skin have to do with it?”
————
A lot, Pam. Look at what many white kentucky dems said…they admitted they won’t vote for a black man.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080520/ap_on_el_pr/campaign_exit_poll
Racism is alive and well.
And it does not matter that Clinton won Kentucky. The state isn’t really in play in the gen. election anyways, has gone Red the past two cycles.
Oregon, on the other hand, is an important blue state that Obama must win. And…he did.
This thing is just about over…
May 21, 2008 - 08:30 AM on May 21st, 2008
“So I submit to the DemoRats: You have a huge problem. Look at the trends, look at the demographics, look at the big picture.”
————————–
Look at the polls:
Obama leads McCain in general election.
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN2034087120080521?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&rpc=22&sp=true
LOL…WTF are you talking about?!? Everything is going GREAT! My man is going to be the nominee and he is already leading McCain.
May 21, 2008 - 08:32 AM on May 21st, 2008
Republicans are the ones who have a huge problem.
Your guy is hella old and unpopular even in your own party…
You have a shitty war that nobody likes, except for McCain who wants to stay there for 1000 years if need be…
The only thing you guys have going for you is your ability to scare people with national security. Yay! you’re good at frightening people, how nice.
May 21, 2008 - 08:59 AM on May 21st, 2008
Oregon, Iowa and Vermont are white and it went to Obama so how is racism even in the equation? Answer: Democrats keep racism alive and well as those that were polled are..gasp…Democrats!
BTW, did you read your source or did you just read the headline?
May 21, 2008 - 09:06 AM on May 21st, 2008
SFL, so when 74% of White voters vote for Hillary, that’s racism. But when 90% of black voters vote for Obama…huh? What? No racism there!
The Republicans are divided because at least Conservatives are honest and they aren’t easily fooled. The Obamiacs ignore the truth, don’t want to address anything negative, and sit there waving their ‘Change We Can Believe In” banners while fawning at every piece of empty rhetoric Obama utters. No reflections there, no reality checks, no criticism allowed.
Obama is a joke. I just fear the joke could be on America.
May 21, 2008 - 09:10 AM on May 21st, 2008
The color of skin has everything to do with it for Leftists. They make a political living focusing on race. While ostensibly calling for color blindness, they make sure no one ever forgets classification by skin color.
May 21, 2008 - 09:19 AM on May 21st, 2008
Why is it that race, education, and personal finances are important to why someone voted the way they did?
May 21, 2008 - 10:21 AM on May 21st, 2008
I blame Howard Dean for this train wreck. He chose not to deal with Florida and Michigan and they will be the “dangling chads” of this election process.
Say what you want, but Senator Clinton has been doing a great job as a NYS Senator. She’s very smart and has been advocating on a lot of very important issues for the state. This while playing the “Junior Senator” roll to the other guy whose one his third term (Chuck Schumer). Once you get beyond all the electioneering crap that’s taking place (on all sides), we’d have gotten an effective leader out of the lot. As you can see, I’m no Obama fan. He seems like just another well-intended person who promises to “shake up Washington”. We need results, not opaque pictures.
David
May 21, 2008 - 10:32 AM on May 21st, 2008
David,
I am trying to see if transcript is available from last nights Fox News coverage, but Hume mentioned comments made by Bob Berkel (?) that essentially, Dean is going to be replaced behind the scenes come summer..He will be DNC Chairman in name only because of this entire disaster. Basically, he has allowed a sure bet such as 2008 to turn into a three ring circus.
Did anyone else catch this?
May 21, 2008 - 10:38 AM on May 21st, 2008
And on a Clinton note…Prior to her running in this election, the media declared her a tremendous Senator, one that earned that seat etc., yet just last night, MSNBC, with Matthews running his mouth, stated that she got the seat because of Bill having sex and she didn’t really earn it. She has earned the right to stay in this election because the rules say she can. For 7 years we have heard about stolen elections and Republicans making up rules as they go along, but it sure seems that some are willing to turn a blind eye if it benefits them!
May 21, 2008 - 10:43 AM on May 21st, 2008
She got her seat in Senate because her opponent was an idiot and she did her homework. New York is an upstate/downstate thing and the upstate people thought she was just another NYC person coming up to see what the trees looked like and they ended up being her best supporters.
Your MSM reference is why I’ve been reading more blogs and watching less TV.
David
May 21, 2008 - 01:12 PM on May 21st, 2008
#14 Yeeeeaaahhhh! Howard Dean is a fool. He is every bit as addled as his utterings have made him sound.
The Dean Primal Scream was an insight after all.
May 21, 2008 - 02:23 PM on May 21st, 2008
Ironically, when Dean was running for president, he was the golden boy that everyone was tripping over themselves to root for. I never considered the “scream” all that rediculous… just funny what the MSM made out of it and they couldn’t drop him fast enough. There really isn’t any loyalty anymore.
David
May 21, 2008 - 05:33 PM on May 21st, 2008
“SFL, so when 74% of White voters vote for Hillary, that’s racism. But when 90% of black voters vote for Obama:huh? What? No racism there!”
—————–
As the article said, racial attitudes DID play a factor when picking a candidate.
When a large majority uneducated whites (Kentucky) don’t vote for the black guy, there’s a strong chance it’s because he’s black. And they even admitted it (racial attitudes)!
When a 90% of blacks vote for Obama, it’s not because they’re voting against a white person, they’re voting for someone who looks like them – someone they can identify with/relate to who has never made it this far before and had an actual chance of winning.
One is overtly racist, and the other is merely racial preference.
That’s the difference.
May 21, 2008 - 05:39 PM on May 21st, 2008
“He will be DNC Chairman in name only because of this entire disaster. Basically, he has allowed a sure bet such as 2008 to turn into a three ring circus.”
————-
That’s total BS.
This is not a disaster…quite the opposite, in fact.
The Democratic base is more energized than ever, the youth vote – for once – made a strong showing in the primaries, both campigns raised waaaaaaay more money than McCain can even dream of…heck, even the negative attacks served a good purpose in getting all that junk out of the way early.
The only people who see a disaster are Conservatives you stand to lose everything. They’ll for sure lose more seats in Congress, and they stand a very strong chance of losing the White House. And, most importantly, Cons just don’t like McCain very much.
Sucks to be a Republican right now. (!)
May 21, 2008 - 05:40 PM on May 21st, 2008
So let me get this straight…
When a black person votes for a black candidate, it is because the person looks like them, but when white person votes for a white candidate, that also looks like them, it is racism?
Wrong! It’s called racism, an act not limited to white people.
So all of Kentucky is uneducated?
May 21, 2008 - 05:44 PM on May 21st, 2008
20- This is a disaster SFL, but it would require you to pay attention to everything that falls under Deans job category. The youth have been showing up at primaries, it is the general election where they fail to show up.
Many of our people are giving up their seats(yes they actually retire) in this election..it was the year to do it and expected. I can’t wait to see what Hillary’s base does!
A funny thing happened on the way to the conventions ” the Republicans caught up to the Democrats for presidential-campaign fundraising
May 21, 2008 - 06:41 PM on May 21st, 2008
#19 SFL you gotta be joking again. You’ve contorted your argument into a pretzel to try to make your case. I laughed all the way through it.
I guess it’s true in the eyes of the Left. Racism is something only white people can have…
May 21, 2008 - 07:56 PM on May 21st, 2008
21 Pam: Yes, Kentucky, West Virginia, and any other State where most white people didn’t vote for Obama can be assumed to be uneducated and racist!
That is the msg loud and clear from the MSM…
May 21, 2008 - 08:57 PM on May 21st, 2008
#22…No, it’s really not a disaster. It’s exciting and either candidate is getting a lot of attention, while McCain is mostly being overshadowed.
#21…not the MSM, but Clinton herself said that her base is made of uneducated white voters. That’s what the exit polls are telling her, and the rest of the nation.
I happen to know two seperate “uneducated” (ie non-college educated) older democrats in Indiana and Kentucky, both voted for Hillary, and both said, quote, “I’m not voting for that nig*er”.
Yeah. They’re not alone.
May 22, 2008 - 06:26 AM on May 22nd, 2008
25- so who does the exit polls that Clinton gets her info from? The media has been participating in this very behavior. Each network does their own polling.
May 22, 2008 - 09:48 AM on May 22nd, 2008
#25 SFL No, it’s the MSM. When one MSM outlet reported on the West Virginia results (with 74% of whites voting for Hilary) a crawler at the bottom of the screen said only 17% of West Virginia voters were college educated. Now just why do you think they had to include that factoid? And when they report on the States Obama wins with huge Black vote totals, do you think they comment on the educational status of those Black voters? I’ll let you answer that.
Your anecdotal example of the racist white DemokRat voters serves only to reinforce what we have been saying for years: the true racists are the Leftists.
May 22, 2008 - 05:08 PM on May 22nd, 2008
Why are you guys so upset about Hillarys admitted support from non-college educated whites?
It’s not in dispute, exit polls confirm it, and Clinton herself has acknowledged it.
It’s not derisive at all to say it; education levels are important demographic factors.
May 22, 2008 - 05:13 PM on May 22nd, 2008
“Your anecdotal example of the racist white DemokRat voters serves only to reinforce what we have been saying for years: the true racists are the Leftists.”
—————————-
You’re telling me that because I/the Left recognize (it was admitted!, they said race was a factor in voting FOR Hillary) racism on the parts of white voters that therefor makes me/the Left racist?
…that doesn’t make any sense. (!)
If The Democratic party was truly as racist as you say/think, then why do majorities of minorities vote Democratic? Are you calling all of them stupid? Are you assuming they aren’t smart enough to make the right decision about which party best fits them?!
And in the same breath, you call Democrats racist?
…it doesn’t work.
May 22, 2008 - 11:04 PM on May 22nd, 2008
SFL you know well we have articulated in great detail about the Democrite Virtual Plantation and how it and the Poverty Pimps have suckered the minorities into voting for them.
You’re playing argumentive possum.
May 22, 2008 - 11:12 PM on May 22nd, 2008
And you are calling minorites stupid.
May 23, 2008 - 02:54 AM on May 23rd, 2008
The Democrite Virtual Plantation dwellers are stupid.
May 23, 2008 - 06:26 AM on May 23rd, 2008
31 No dumber than the voters in Kentucky.