Comments on: The Warped Mind of the Hardcore Leftist http://rightvoices.com/2008/05/28/the-warped-mind-of-the-hardcore-leftist/ in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane. Sun, 08 Aug 2010 14:43:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: ssi gov http://rightvoices.com/2008/05/28/the-warped-mind-of-the-hardcore-leftist/comment-page-1/#comment-724538 ssi gov Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:58:41 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/05/28/the-warped-mind-of-the-hardcore-leftist/#comment-724538 [...] institution is. But just try to name a better country! Historically, the victor in war either shttp://rightvoices.com/2008/05/28/the-warped-mind-of-the-hardcore-leftist/Fisherman goes up the food chain for answer San Diego Union-TribuneGrowing up in Ukraine, back when [...] [...] institution is. But just try to name a better country! Historically, the victor in war either shttp://rightvoices.com/2008/05/28/the-warped-mind-of-the-hardcore-leftist/Fisherman goes up the food chain for answer San Diego Union-TribuneGrowing up in Ukraine, back when [...]

]]> By: snowy egret http://rightvoices.com/2008/05/28/the-warped-mind-of-the-hardcore-leftist/comment-page-1/#comment-723625 snowy egret Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:01:34 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/05/28/the-warped-mind-of-the-hardcore-leftist/#comment-723625 On your motorcycle gun the engine and rip that crappy sign right in two BOYCOTT SAN FRANCISCO:-w On your motorcycle gun the engine and rip that crappy sign right in two BOYCOTT SAN FRANCISCO:-w

]]> By: libbie basher http://rightvoices.com/2008/05/28/the-warped-mind-of-the-hardcore-leftist/comment-page-1/#comment-723559 libbie basher Sat, 31 May 2008 20:35:51 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/05/28/the-warped-mind-of-the-hardcore-leftist/#comment-723559 Robert # 27 Amen. Robert # 27

Amen.

]]> By: Robert http://rightvoices.com/2008/05/28/the-warped-mind-of-the-hardcore-leftist/comment-page-1/#comment-723549 Robert Sat, 31 May 2008 16:06:24 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/05/28/the-warped-mind-of-the-hardcore-leftist/#comment-723549 They want to go to Allah. They are willing to commit suicide to kill their enemies. So if they had the means, they would not hesitate to destroy the entire planet if they got the idea in their warped minds that it was the thing to do. They want to go to Allah. They are willing to commit suicide to kill their enemies. So if they had the means, they would not hesitate to destroy the entire planet if they got the idea in their warped minds that it was the thing to do.

]]> By: BonBon http://rightvoices.com/2008/05/28/the-warped-mind-of-the-hardcore-leftist/comment-page-1/#comment-723539 BonBon Sat, 31 May 2008 12:48:28 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/05/28/the-warped-mind-of-the-hardcore-leftist/#comment-723539 SFL. I disagree. It would very much fit in with their global islamic empire. They would show the world, and other muslims around the globe, just how powerful they were. SFL. I disagree. It would very much fit in with their global islamic empire. They would show the world, and other muslims around the globe, just how powerful they were.

]]> By: Robert http://rightvoices.com/2008/05/28/the-warped-mind-of-the-hardcore-leftist/comment-page-1/#comment-723535 Robert Sat, 31 May 2008 05:29:01 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/05/28/the-warped-mind-of-the-hardcore-leftist/#comment-723535 "And if that can be accepted, than it can be argued that technically the US could be considered the worlds "biggest"terrorist, as it potentially "threatens"a larger amount of people than some jackass with a bomb could ever dream of." Nonsense. A terrorist is someone who goes out and performs terrorist acts. Not one who could potentially threaten. And even if a "terrorist" threatened someone, if they didn't follow through and achieve credibility, they would soon have no credibility and no longer be a terrorist. I chronicled the ways America has been generous and benevolent to even its former enemies. Action speak louder than words and promises. Again, name another Nation in history that has done that. So how again is America a terrorist? How can in any way can that case be made? I don't believe it can, and those whackjobs in the photo are just that---whackjobs. “And if that can be accepted, than it can be argued that technically the US could be considered the worlds “biggest”terrorist, as it potentially “threatens”a larger amount of people than some jackass with a bomb could ever dream of.”

Nonsense. A terrorist is someone who goes out and performs terrorist acts. Not one who could potentially threaten. And even if a “terrorist” threatened someone, if they didn’t follow through and achieve credibility, they would soon have no credibility and no longer be a terrorist.

I chronicled the ways America has been generous and benevolent to even its former enemies. Action speak louder than words and promises. Again, name another Nation in history that has done that.

So how again is America a terrorist? How can in any way can that case be made? I don’t believe it can, and those whackjobs in the photo are just that—whackjobs.

]]> By: PCD http://rightvoices.com/2008/05/28/the-warped-mind-of-the-hardcore-leftist/comment-page-1/#comment-723528 PCD Sat, 31 May 2008 01:29:27 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/05/28/the-warped-mind-of-the-hardcore-leftist/#comment-723528 21, SFL, take a condom and pull it over your head. You'll have a 20% survival rate. 21, SFL, take a condom and pull it over your head. You’ll have a 20% survival rate.

]]> By: San Francisco Liberal http://rightvoices.com/2008/05/28/the-warped-mind-of-the-hardcore-leftist/comment-page-1/#comment-723524 San Francisco Liberal Fri, 30 May 2008 23:41:43 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/05/28/the-warped-mind-of-the-hardcore-leftist/#comment-723524 "...unlike the radical Islamic Jihadists who would destroy the planet without a second thought." ------------------------------- I seriously doubt that. That wouldn't fit into their whole "global Islamic Empire" scheme. And regarding my original point, there are tens of millions if not billions of humans who are "terrorized" (admitedly, muuuch less so than in previous decades) by the thought of Nuclear Annihilation by the US - however unlikly because of our "good nature". And if that can be accepted, than it can be argued that technically the US could be considered the worlds "biggest" terrorist, as it potentially "threatens" a larger amount of people than some jackass with a bomb could ever dream of. That said - SFL wouldn't march down a street holding that sign, but I also wouldn't really disagree 100% with its message either... “…unlike the radical Islamic Jihadists who would destroy the planet without a second thought.”

——————————-

I seriously doubt that. That wouldn’t fit into their whole “global Islamic Empire” scheme.

And regarding my original point, there are tens of millions if not billions of humans who are “terrorized” (admitedly, muuuch less so than in previous decades) by the thought of Nuclear Annihilation by the US – however unlikly because of our “good nature”.

And if that can be accepted, than it can be argued that technically the US could be considered the worlds “biggest” terrorist, as it potentially “threatens” a larger amount of people than some jackass with a bomb could ever dream of.

That said – SFL wouldn’t march down a street holding that sign, but I also wouldn’t really disagree 100% with its message either…

]]> By: Robert http://rightvoices.com/2008/05/28/the-warped-mind-of-the-hardcore-leftist/comment-page-1/#comment-723516 Robert Fri, 30 May 2008 20:56:56 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/05/28/the-warped-mind-of-the-hardcore-leftist/#comment-723516 "The US does have the ability to cause EXTREME damage to the planet and all life on it with its 4000+ active Nuclear warheads." Except that the U.S. is not seeking to do that, unlike the radical Islamic Jihadists who would destroy the planet without a second thought. Ever heard of MADD? Has worked great for 50 years. Anyone who thinks the U.S. could disarm and any existing and potential enemies would also do so does not deserve to have an opinion on the subject. Like those complete idiots in the picture. “The US does have the ability to cause EXTREME damage to the planet and all life on it with its 4000+ active Nuclear warheads.”

Except that the U.S. is not seeking to do that, unlike the radical Islamic Jihadists who would destroy the planet without a second thought.

Ever heard of MADD? Has worked great for 50 years. Anyone who thinks the U.S. could disarm and any existing and potential enemies would also do so does not deserve to have an opinion on the subject. Like those complete idiots in the picture.

]]> By: San Francisco Liberal http://rightvoices.com/2008/05/28/the-warped-mind-of-the-hardcore-leftist/comment-page-1/#comment-723501 San Francisco Liberal Fri, 30 May 2008 17:20:46 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/05/28/the-warped-mind-of-the-hardcore-leftist/#comment-723501 "No wonder the world is in such troubles" ------------------------ Actually, PCD, it's really because people like you exist who are politicaly and socialy incompetent that the world is in such trouble. In case you didn't look, or just didn't know; the sources of WMD totals from the link I provided are: ^ Norris, Robert S., and Hans M. Kristensen, "U.S. nuclear forces, 2008", Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 64:1 (March/April 2008): 50-53, [2]. ^ Norris, Robert S. and Hans M. Kristensen. "Russian nuclear forces, 2006," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 62:2 (March/April 2006): 64-67, ------------------ Impeachable? Doesn't look like it... Get a frickin' clue, guy. OR...maybe you can come up with some figures of your own. (you can't just make it up, though) “No wonder the world is in such troubles”

————————

Actually, PCD, it’s really because people like you exist who are politicaly and socialy incompetent that the world is in such trouble.

In case you didn’t look, or just didn’t know; the sources of WMD totals from the link I provided are:

^ Norris, Robert S., and Hans M. Kristensen, “U.S. nuclear forces, 2008″, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 64:1 (March/April 2008): 50-53, [2].
^ Norris, Robert S. and Hans M. Kristensen. “Russian nuclear forces, 2006,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 62:2 (March/April 2006): 64-67,

——————

Impeachable? Doesn’t look like it…

Get a frickin’ clue, guy. OR…maybe you can come up with some figures of your own. (you can’t just make it up, though)

]]>