<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Obama&#8217;s Far-Left New Party: Radical? Check. Tied to ACORN? Check. Redistributionist? Check.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightvoices.com/2008/10/20/on-obama%e2%80%99s-far-left-new-party-radical-check-tied-to-acorn-check-redistributionist-check/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/10/20/on-obama%e2%80%99s-far-left-new-party-radical-check-tied-to-acorn-check-redistributionist-check/</link>
	<description>in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 14:43:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/10/20/on-obama%e2%80%99s-far-left-new-party-radical-check-tied-to-acorn-check-redistributionist-check/comment-page-1/#comment-730806</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=10944#comment-730806</guid>
		<description>Criticism of Obama&#039;s policies, positions, background, or the Messiah himself! :o That is intolerable to Obamiacs! You have transgressed against them.

According to &quot;La Mentalita&quot; (which unless I am mistaken could be interpreted to mean little mind; very appropriate), you are racist for critcizing anything about Obama whatsoever! :o</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Criticism of Obama&#8217;s policies, positions, background, or the Messiah himself! <img src='http://rightvoices.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' />  That is intolerable to Obamiacs! You have transgressed against them.</p>
<p>According to &#8220;La Mentalita&#8221; (which unless I am mistaken could be interpreted to mean little mind; very appropriate), you are racist for critcizing anything about Obama whatsoever! <img src='http://rightvoices.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrmrArtyOffcr</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/10/20/on-obama%e2%80%99s-far-left-new-party-radical-check-tied-to-acorn-check-redistributionist-check/comment-page-1/#comment-730780</link>
		<dc:creator>FrmrArtyOffcr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=10944#comment-730780</guid>
		<description>Well Let&#039;s see where Obama&#039;s economic policy foundations come from... His father was a Marxist. His Grandfather&#039;s friend, that Obama referred to as Uncle Frank was Frank Marshal a member of the American COMMUNIST party. He claims to want to &quot;spread the wealth&quot; and tax the rich to do it. Giving money taken from a person who earned it and giving it to one that didn&#039;t is called theft if someone without a badge does it, it&#039;s called Socialism when someone with an IRS badge does it. 

Here&#039;s a thought for all of you little leftists out there. When was the last time a poor person built a factory and hired a bunch of people? When a company has to cut operating expenses to pay taxes, they cut the largest controllable expense which is payroll, ie they cut jobs. How much income tax does someone who&#039;s unemployed pay into the system? Is it more than they take out or less? How easy is it for someone to pay their mortgage or rent on unemployment benefits? When a company can no longer reduce its payroll expenses to pay taxes and stay in business, how do they get the money to continue paying taxes? They raise prices. The only means to attempt to control inflation is for the federal reserve to raise interest rates to restrict buying. This is why when you raise taxes on businesses, you cause increases in unemployment, inflation, and interest rates. This leads to a condition called Stagflation. A stagnant economy (no growth) at the same time that there is double digit inflation. If you want confirmation of what I&#039;ve said is true, research the Carter administration. Obama is nothing new, except he just wants to do it on a much grander scale with a larger economy, a larger population, and stakes that make him look like a high roller to Jimmy Carter&#039;s penny ante player. His plans will bankrupt this country. It could result in a worldwide depression that makes the 30s look like a joke. If that occurs, I expect a revolution to break out. Quite possibly with the US being broken into a number of regional countries as various ethnic groups fight for supremacy in their sphere of influence. Considering I&#039;m in what the Mexicans want to claim as Aztlan, I&#039;m not very keen on that idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Let&#8217;s see where Obama&#8217;s economic policy foundations come from&#8230; His father was a Marxist. His Grandfather&#8217;s friend, that Obama referred to as Uncle Frank was Frank Marshal a member of the American COMMUNIST party. He claims to want to &#8220;spread the wealth&#8221; and tax the rich to do it. Giving money taken from a person who earned it and giving it to one that didn&#8217;t is called theft if someone without a badge does it, it&#8217;s called Socialism when someone with an IRS badge does it. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a thought for all of you little leftists out there. When was the last time a poor person built a factory and hired a bunch of people? When a company has to cut operating expenses to pay taxes, they cut the largest controllable expense which is payroll, ie they cut jobs. How much income tax does someone who&#8217;s unemployed pay into the system? Is it more than they take out or less? How easy is it for someone to pay their mortgage or rent on unemployment benefits? When a company can no longer reduce its payroll expenses to pay taxes and stay in business, how do they get the money to continue paying taxes? They raise prices. The only means to attempt to control inflation is for the federal reserve to raise interest rates to restrict buying. This is why when you raise taxes on businesses, you cause increases in unemployment, inflation, and interest rates. This leads to a condition called Stagflation. A stagnant economy (no growth) at the same time that there is double digit inflation. If you want confirmation of what I&#8217;ve said is true, research the Carter administration. Obama is nothing new, except he just wants to do it on a much grander scale with a larger economy, a larger population, and stakes that make him look like a high roller to Jimmy Carter&#8217;s penny ante player. His plans will bankrupt this country. It could result in a worldwide depression that makes the 30s look like a joke. If that occurs, I expect a revolution to break out. Quite possibly with the US being broken into a number of regional countries as various ethnic groups fight for supremacy in their sphere of influence. Considering I&#8217;m in what the Mexicans want to claim as Aztlan, I&#8217;m not very keen on that idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/10/20/on-obama%e2%80%99s-far-left-new-party-radical-check-tied-to-acorn-check-redistributionist-check/comment-page-1/#comment-730684</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=10944#comment-730684</guid>
		<description>&quot;Let me ask all of you folks posing the &quot;Socialism issue&quot;a simple question. What is it about Obama&#039;s plan that suggests he&#039;s a socialist? The fact that he wants to tax the extremely wealthy and cut taxes for the extremely poor? This isn&#039;t a redistribution of wealth.&quot;

You are a Socialist, and if you are a Patriot it isn&#039;t of traditional America. 

Obama is not only a Socialist, he&#039;s a Marxist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Let me ask all of you folks posing the &#8220;Socialism issue&#8221;a simple question. What is it about Obama&#8217;s plan that suggests he&#8217;s a socialist? The fact that he wants to tax the extremely wealthy and cut taxes for the extremely poor? This isn&#8217;t a redistribution of wealth.&#8221;</p>
<p>You are a Socialist, and if you are a Patriot it isn&#8217;t of traditional America. </p>
<p>Obama is not only a Socialist, he&#8217;s a Marxist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/10/20/on-obama%e2%80%99s-far-left-new-party-radical-check-tied-to-acorn-check-redistributionist-check/comment-page-1/#comment-730678</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 01:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=10944#comment-730678</guid>
		<description>APTTITLE-

We have many conversations on the subject of redistribution of wealth in the archives.  Taking tax money from the wealthy and handing a person $1200 at the end of the year, a person that didn&#039;t pay any income tax, is by definition, redistribution of wealth.  It is welfare.  We both know that.  And what is the poors burden?  What is their responsibility?

When did you start quoting Powell, yesterday? 

I pay local/state taxes for the schools, police, fire, libraries, roads  etc..Part of my federal taxes cover the same items..What does Obama have to do with it?  It takes the House and the Senate to appropriate the funds, all the POTUS does is sign it.

Why should the top 5% pay more?  They are paying more than their fair share.  There is no reason that any of the services listed aren&#039;t already being taken care of. 

BTW, who is complaining about paying for those services?   We are referring to redistribution of wealth.. 

FYI..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>APTTITLE-</p>
<p>We have many conversations on the subject of redistribution of wealth in the archives.  Taking tax money from the wealthy and handing a person $1200 at the end of the year, a person that didn&#8217;t pay any income tax, is by definition, redistribution of wealth.  It is welfare.  We both know that.  And what is the poors burden?  What is their responsibility?</p>
<p>When did you start quoting Powell, yesterday? </p>
<p>I pay local/state taxes for the schools, police, fire, libraries, roads  etc..Part of my federal taxes cover the same items..What does Obama have to do with it?  It takes the House and the Senate to appropriate the funds, all the POTUS does is sign it.</p>
<p>Why should the top 5% pay more?  They are paying more than their fair share.  There is no reason that any of the services listed aren&#8217;t already being taken care of. </p>
<p>BTW, who is complaining about paying for those services?   We are referring to redistribution of wealth.. </p>
<p>FYI..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apttitle</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/10/20/on-obama%e2%80%99s-far-left-new-party-radical-check-tied-to-acorn-check-redistributionist-check/comment-page-1/#comment-730675</link>
		<dc:creator>apttitle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=10944#comment-730675</guid>
		<description>Let me ask all of you folks posing the &quot;Socialism issue&quot; a simple question. What is it about Obama&#039;s plan that suggests he&#039;s a socialist? The fact that he wants to tax the extremely wealthy and cut taxes for the extremely poor? This isn&#039;t a redistribution of wealth. There&#039;s nothing here that suggests Obama is interested in taking that money from the wealthy and GIVING it to the poor. That&#039;s not what he&#039;s doing with his tax plan. He&#039;s simply putting the burden of our society a little bit more on the shoulder&#039;s of those who can most handle it and taking it a little off of those who can&#039;t. That burden of our society, as Powell so clearly put it in his Meet The Press appearance includes maintenance of our roads, police forces, fire departments, schools, public infrastructure like bridges, public utilities (sewer, water, gas), our military, etc. Now I don&#039;t know about you, but I tend to think that these burdens of our society are incredibly important to us as a nation. And its easy for me to say because I&#039;m not in the 5% of the country who&#039;d be taxed a little more, that I think taxing the rich is a good way to go towards making sure those things are ensured and supported by our government. Hell, whatever taxes I would end up paying under an Obama presidency I would much prefer go towards these VITAL services. Call me a Socialist if you like, but I just think I&#039;m a patriot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me ask all of you folks posing the &#8220;Socialism issue&#8221; a simple question. What is it about Obama&#8217;s plan that suggests he&#8217;s a socialist? The fact that he wants to tax the extremely wealthy and cut taxes for the extremely poor? This isn&#8217;t a redistribution of wealth. There&#8217;s nothing here that suggests Obama is interested in taking that money from the wealthy and GIVING it to the poor. That&#8217;s not what he&#8217;s doing with his tax plan. He&#8217;s simply putting the burden of our society a little bit more on the shoulder&#8217;s of those who can most handle it and taking it a little off of those who can&#8217;t. That burden of our society, as Powell so clearly put it in his Meet The Press appearance includes maintenance of our roads, police forces, fire departments, schools, public infrastructure like bridges, public utilities (sewer, water, gas), our military, etc. Now I don&#8217;t know about you, but I tend to think that these burdens of our society are incredibly important to us as a nation. And its easy for me to say because I&#8217;m not in the 5% of the country who&#8217;d be taxed a little more, that I think taxing the rich is a good way to go towards making sure those things are ensured and supported by our government. Hell, whatever taxes I would end up paying under an Obama presidency I would much prefer go towards these VITAL services. Call me a Socialist if you like, but I just think I&#8217;m a patriot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/10/20/on-obama%e2%80%99s-far-left-new-party-radical-check-tied-to-acorn-check-redistributionist-check/comment-page-1/#comment-730674</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=10944#comment-730674</guid>
		<description>Exactly John =d&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly John =d></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/10/20/on-obama%e2%80%99s-far-left-new-party-radical-check-tied-to-acorn-check-redistributionist-check/comment-page-1/#comment-730673</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=10944#comment-730673</guid>
		<description>Why are you trying to distract me from the real issues like Joe the Plumber&#039;s tax records?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are you trying to distract me from the real issues like Joe the Plumber&#8217;s tax records?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

