<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Will Spread Your Wealth, Not His: SPREAD WEALTH AROUND: OBAMA AUNT FOUND IN BOSTON SLUM&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightvoices.com/2008/10/29/obama-will-spread-your-wealth-not-his-spread-wealth-around-obama-aunt-found-in-boston-slum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/10/29/obama-will-spread-your-wealth-not-his-spread-wealth-around-obama-aunt-found-in-boston-slum/</link>
	<description>in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 14:43:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: - Are You Riled Up? - &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obama Will Spread Your Wealth, Not His: Spread Wealth Around &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/10/29/obama-will-spread-your-wealth-not-his-spread-wealth-around-obama-aunt-found-in-boston-slum/comment-page-1/#comment-731875</link>
		<dc:creator>- Are You Riled Up? - &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obama Will Spread Your Wealth, Not His: Spread Wealth Around &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 01:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=11352#comment-731875</guid>
		<description>[...] However, anyone interested in seeing for themselves the type of contributions collected and from what corporate groups need only to look in the congressional record for the financial history on each candidate and the monies they have so &#8230;[Continue Reading] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, anyone interested in seeing for themselves the type of contributions collected and from what corporate groups need only to look in the congressional record for the financial history on each candidate and the monies they have so &#8230;[Continue Reading] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ALERT: Obama&#8217;s â€œAunti Zeituniâ€ Is An Illegal Alien, A Deportation FUGITIVE, Lives In Public Housing, And Donated To His Campaign &#124; Right Voices</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/10/29/obama-will-spread-your-wealth-not-his-spread-wealth-around-obama-aunt-found-in-boston-slum/comment-page-1/#comment-731781</link>
		<dc:creator>ALERT: Obama&#8217;s â€œAunti Zeituniâ€ Is An Illegal Alien, A Deportation FUGITIVE, Lives In Public Housing, And Donated To His Campaign &#124; Right Voices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 14:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=11352#comment-731781</guid>
		<description>[...] RobertBill if you want to see an intelligent, truthful post, see Joan of Arc&#8217;s post above. Your posts are... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] RobertBill if you want to see an intelligent, truthful post, see Joan of Arc&#8217;s post above. Your posts are&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/10/29/obama-will-spread-your-wealth-not-his-spread-wealth-around-obama-aunt-found-in-boston-slum/comment-page-1/#comment-731758</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=11352#comment-731758</guid>
		<description>Bill if you want to see an intelligent, truthful post, see Joan of Arc&#039;s post above.

Your posts are exercises in argumentive masturbation, which is why NOBODY took them seriously.

I just don&#039;t know how we are going to be able to get along without you, Bill. But your paid job on the Obama internet team ends after Tuesday so you&#039;d be gone anyway. I guess we&#039;ll manage somehow.

See ya!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill if you want to see an intelligent, truthful post, see Joan of Arc&#8217;s post above.</p>
<p>Your posts are exercises in argumentive masturbation, which is why NOBODY took them seriously.</p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t know how we are going to be able to get along without you, Bill. But your paid job on the Obama internet team ends after Tuesday so you&#8217;d be gone anyway. I guess we&#8217;ll manage somehow.</p>
<p>See ya!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/10/29/obama-will-spread-your-wealth-not-his-spread-wealth-around-obama-aunt-found-in-boston-slum/comment-page-1/#comment-731756</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 23:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=11352#comment-731756</guid>
		<description>Actually going in circles was my point!  Doesn&#039;t anyone have a sense of humor anymore?  I could have been boring and dry in showing that your logic was flawed, but that&#039;s no fun.  

And I&#039;ve asking everyone here for examples of what they mean about certain things, but instead of fact-based replies, I get insulted.  Wah! hehe! I sound like Palin now!  My rights are being infringed on by you! wah-wah! haha!  And yes, that is what she said today.

And I believe I have been coherent and focused by supporting my statements.  I guess the only thing understood anymore is being mean, nasty and insulting.  Oh..wait a minute...that is what McSame is doing, and he&#039;s LOSING!

So this was fun while it lasted.  I&#039;m going to look for another board where there are real discussions.  But, as my parting gift to you, my silver tongued friends, I leave you with two web sites.  The first you usually wouldn&#039;t watch becasue it is &quot;left wing liberal nut case&quot; blah blah blah (insert more right wing fascist crap here), but they did some good editing for Obama jokes.  
http://www.hulu.com/watch/41731/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-thu-oct-30-2008

And this one gets updated every few days-so alwasy something new to find!
http://www.palinaspresident.us/

Enjoy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually going in circles was my point!  Doesn&#8217;t anyone have a sense of humor anymore?  I could have been boring and dry in showing that your logic was flawed, but that&#8217;s no fun.  </p>
<p>And I&#8217;ve asking everyone here for examples of what they mean about certain things, but instead of fact-based replies, I get insulted.  Wah! hehe! I sound like Palin now!  My rights are being infringed on by you! wah-wah! haha!  And yes, that is what she said today.</p>
<p>And I believe I have been coherent and focused by supporting my statements.  I guess the only thing understood anymore is being mean, nasty and insulting.  Oh..wait a minute&#8230;that is what McSame is doing, and he&#8217;s LOSING!</p>
<p>So this was fun while it lasted.  I&#8217;m going to look for another board where there are real discussions.  But, as my parting gift to you, my silver tongued friends, I leave you with two web sites.  The first you usually wouldn&#8217;t watch becasue it is &#8220;left wing liberal nut case&#8221; blah blah blah (insert more right wing fascist crap here), but they did some good editing for Obama jokes.<br />
<a href="http://www.hulu.com/watch/41731/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-thu-oct-30-2008" rel="nofollow">http://www.hulu.com/watch/41731/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-thu-oct-30-2008</a></p>
<p>And this one gets updated every few days-so alwasy something new to find!<br />
<a href="http://www.palinaspresident.us/" rel="nofollow">http://www.palinaspresident.us/</a></p>
<p>Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/10/29/obama-will-spread-your-wealth-not-his-spread-wealth-around-obama-aunt-found-in-boston-slum/comment-page-1/#comment-731755</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 23:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=11352#comment-731755</guid>
		<description>Here is the link again where McCain says Obama not a socialist.
Does this mean he was lying about before, lying now, or that Palin doesn&#039;t know what socialism is? I&#039;m so confused by him - I don&#039;t think he can be trusted.  Do you?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/30/obama-not-a-socialist-mcc_n_139294.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the link again where McCain says Obama not a socialist.<br />
Does this mean he was lying about before, lying now, or that Palin doesn&#8217;t know what socialism is? I&#8217;m so confused by him &#8211; I don&#8217;t think he can be trusted.  Do you?<br />
<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/30/obama-not-a-socialist-mcc_n_139294.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/30/obama-not-a-socialist-mcc_n_139294.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/10/29/obama-will-spread-your-wealth-not-his-spread-wealth-around-obama-aunt-found-in-boston-slum/comment-page-1/#comment-731754</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 23:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=11352#comment-731754</guid>
		<description>Bill you are going around in circles. Your addled mind is more evidence that Liberalism is a form of mental illness. You can&#039;t focus and state anything coherently and accurately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill you are going around in circles. Your addled mind is more evidence that Liberalism is a form of mental illness. You can&#8217;t focus and state anything coherently and accurately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/10/29/obama-will-spread-your-wealth-not-his-spread-wealth-around-obama-aunt-found-in-boston-slum/comment-page-1/#comment-731753</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 23:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=11352#comment-731753</guid>
		<description>Those were your words, Robert. Which, I assume, you don&#039;t approve of, since they wouldn&#039;t be mine, but yours. But if they&#039;re yours you should approve.  But now you can&#039;t.  WOW!  Huh?  I could do more, but hopefully you get my point. 

 It reminds of when I was in 3rd grade and learning new vocabulary and had to make a sentence using the word. And then someone would always get busted for using the word to explain the word!  Something like...let me see..a Marxist is someone that hangs around with Marxists.  BUSTED!

So I&#039;m curious.  You imply that you never use any outside sources, and never use what anyone has said or written. So how do you know anything?  For instance, if I said a word you didn&#039;t know (oh come on Robert...stop laughing..it could happen!) where would you go to find out what the word meant?  Or would you ignore it?  And a word is easy, but what about a new concept?

This must be what it is like &quot;talkin&quot; to Palin!  I think I&#039;m turnin Palinese, I think I&#039;m turnin Palinese, I really think so!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those were your words, Robert. Which, I assume, you don&#8217;t approve of, since they wouldn&#8217;t be mine, but yours. But if they&#8217;re yours you should approve.  But now you can&#8217;t.  WOW!  Huh?  I could do more, but hopefully you get my point. </p>
<p> It reminds of when I was in 3rd grade and learning new vocabulary and had to make a sentence using the word. And then someone would always get busted for using the word to explain the word!  Something like&#8230;let me see..a Marxist is someone that hangs around with Marxists.  BUSTED!</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m curious.  You imply that you never use any outside sources, and never use what anyone has said or written. So how do you know anything?  For instance, if I said a word you didn&#8217;t know (oh come on Robert&#8230;stop laughing..it could happen!) where would you go to find out what the word meant?  Or would you ignore it?  And a word is easy, but what about a new concept?</p>
<p>This must be what it is like &#8220;talkin&#8221; to Palin!  I think I&#8217;m turnin Palinese, I think I&#8217;m turnin Palinese, I really think so!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/10/29/obama-will-spread-your-wealth-not-his-spread-wealth-around-obama-aunt-found-in-boston-slum/comment-page-1/#comment-731751</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 22:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=11352#comment-731751</guid>
		<description>Glad to see you figured it out finally, Bill. You&#039;ll see it is remarkable what you can accomplish when you stop looking around for other people and sources to tell you what to think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see you figured it out finally, Bill. You&#8217;ll see it is remarkable what you can accomplish when you stop looking around for other people and sources to tell you what to think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan of Arc</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/10/29/obama-will-spread-your-wealth-not-his-spread-wealth-around-obama-aunt-found-in-boston-slum/comment-page-1/#comment-731749</link>
		<dc:creator>Joan of Arc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 22:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=11352#comment-731749</guid>
		<description>Manipulation of the Voter
Obama&#039;s attitude towards providing legal verifiable documentation to support his candidacy tells me he is hiding something.  This makes me leery of how far he will go to cover up any discrepancies. At this late date I would find it hard for me to accept anything he provides. 

When a party has the need to purchase such an exorbitant amount of TV and radio time through the media who provide one-sided journalism for the direct purpose of influencing and swaying the American population over to their side, I call it brainwashing, and the tactic of terrorists and a deliberate means of buying the public&#039;s vote.   I only hope that the voters will exercise their freedom to vote without coercion, in any form. When the issue of discrimination is injected, especially â€˜racism&#039;, to anger the voter and solicit an immediate and un-informed position, I consider that descriptively taking advantage and trying to manipulate the voter. 

The purpose of campaign contributions is to promote a candidate&#039;s campaign not their lifestyle or greedy habits.

The largest portion of all campaign money is contributed by corporate America, and must be recouped by some means otherwise we wouldn&#039;t be seeing the magnitude of contributions that has resulted during this campaign.  Is there no doubt the wealthy donors will be expecting to secure support for their political and social interests in return for these hefty contributions.  The ones affected the most will not be the candidate but the American people.  Our greatest concern should be, whether we are willing to continue being indentured servants to the cause in the selection of the new political candidates and in payment for these favors through higher consumer prices to offset the amount of contributions provided.  This year the campaign costs will exceed over $5 billion.  I call this extremely excessive and definitely will affect our economy by increased consumer prices, but the collection process goes on. Obama, who is supposed to be a pro understanding our economic problems has gone in the opposite direction.  No one has to believe me.  However, anyone interested in seeing for themselves the type of contributions collected and from what corporate groups need only to look in the congressional record for the financial history on each candidate and the monies they have so far collected.

Discrimination in any form â€“ race, gender, age, or education or lack thereof should be below our standards!  

Unless you do the research yourselves, will you really become educated about each of the candidates.  If you choose to take the easy way out and base your decisions on which is the best candidate according to the propaganda you are not only doing an injustice to your country but yourselves as well. This type of approach is reflective of that used by terrorists to confuse people and under mind a country.  Jumping on the bandwagon before you know all the facts makes you just as bad as the people you say you will not support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manipulation of the Voter<br />
Obama&#8217;s attitude towards providing legal verifiable documentation to support his candidacy tells me he is hiding something.  This makes me leery of how far he will go to cover up any discrepancies. At this late date I would find it hard for me to accept anything he provides. </p>
<p>When a party has the need to purchase such an exorbitant amount of TV and radio time through the media who provide one-sided journalism for the direct purpose of influencing and swaying the American population over to their side, I call it brainwashing, and the tactic of terrorists and a deliberate means of buying the public&#8217;s vote.   I only hope that the voters will exercise their freedom to vote without coercion, in any form. When the issue of discrimination is injected, especially â€˜racism&#8217;, to anger the voter and solicit an immediate and un-informed position, I consider that descriptively taking advantage and trying to manipulate the voter. </p>
<p>The purpose of campaign contributions is to promote a candidate&#8217;s campaign not their lifestyle or greedy habits.</p>
<p>The largest portion of all campaign money is contributed by corporate America, and must be recouped by some means otherwise we wouldn&#8217;t be seeing the magnitude of contributions that has resulted during this campaign.  Is there no doubt the wealthy donors will be expecting to secure support for their political and social interests in return for these hefty contributions.  The ones affected the most will not be the candidate but the American people.  Our greatest concern should be, whether we are willing to continue being indentured servants to the cause in the selection of the new political candidates and in payment for these favors through higher consumer prices to offset the amount of contributions provided.  This year the campaign costs will exceed over $5 billion.  I call this extremely excessive and definitely will affect our economy by increased consumer prices, but the collection process goes on. Obama, who is supposed to be a pro understanding our economic problems has gone in the opposite direction.  No one has to believe me.  However, anyone interested in seeing for themselves the type of contributions collected and from what corporate groups need only to look in the congressional record for the financial history on each candidate and the monies they have so far collected.</p>
<p>Discrimination in any form â€“ race, gender, age, or education or lack thereof should be below our standards!  </p>
<p>Unless you do the research yourselves, will you really become educated about each of the candidates.  If you choose to take the easy way out and base your decisions on which is the best candidate according to the propaganda you are not only doing an injustice to your country but yourselves as well. This type of approach is reflective of that used by terrorists to confuse people and under mind a country.  Jumping on the bandwagon before you know all the facts makes you just as bad as the people you say you will not support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/10/29/obama-will-spread-your-wealth-not-his-spread-wealth-around-obama-aunt-found-in-boston-slum/comment-page-1/#comment-731731</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=11352#comment-731731</guid>
		<description>Robert,
&quot;A Marxist is one who believes in and adheres to and wants to practice the philosophy of Karl Marx.&quot;

DUH!

&quot;Pleeeezzz:douche:&quot;  your words....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,<br />
&#8220;A Marxist is one who believes in and adheres to and wants to practice the philosophy of Karl Marx.&#8221;</p>
<p>DUH!</p>
<p>&#8220;Pleeeezzz:douche:&#8221;  your words&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

