Don’t we have the FBI that handles this?

8 Responses to “Obama Vows To Create ‘Civilian National Security Force’…”

1. Bo
   November 8, 2009 - 08:52 AM on November 8th, 2009

   I think this could be a revised plan first considered by ‘Homeland Security’. Personally, 2008-09 is a different world than it was in 1978. I don’t trust my neighbors, much of my family, or people at work these days because they don’t act human and act like zombies trying to convince me I should be afraid about every little thing. This experiment didn’t fly with the Salem witch hunt and failed in Nazi Germany. Tragic! As a Christian, I find this sad and against God’s order of doing things…

2. jeffg
   November 1, 2008 - 08:14 PM on November 1st, 2008

   Just another sick twisted idea from the sickest, most mentally deranged candidate in american history. On Nov 4th, he will be rejected by the real americans!! I wonder who the next misfit will be in 2012!! I’m worried because every 4 years they get worse!

3. J S
   November 3, 2008 - 08:05 AM on November 3rd, 2008

   You have got to be kidding me! Talk about taking something completely out of context and then using it to whip yourself into a hysterical frenzy! Take a moment to listen to what he was actually saying – you don’t have to listen to the whole thing, just start at minute 12:50 and spend 5 minutes: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Df2p6867_pw&feature=related. This willful disregard of truth and common respect is just one more example of what has gone so awfully wrong in a party I once so deeply respected.

4. tim
   November 3, 2008 - 04:09 PM on November 3rd, 2008

   Philip J. Berg Will Be Arriving U.S. Supreme Court, Washington, DC at 3:15
   p.m. today to file for an Injunction to Stay Presidential Election Pending
   Writ of Certiorari regarding Obama who is “NOT” qualified to be President of
   the United States

   (Press Release – 10/30/08 – Contact information and pdf of press release at
   bottom)

   (Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/30/08) – Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the
   Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s
   lack of “qualifications”to serve as President of the United States,
   announced today that he will
   be at the United States Supreme Court today, October 30, 2008 to file:

   1. Application to Justice Souter for an Immediate Injunction to Stay the
   Presidential Election of November 4, 2008; and
   2. Writ of Certiorari.

   Berg stated, “I am hopeful that the U.S. Supreme Court will grant the
   Injunction pending a review of this case to avoid a Constitutional Crisis by
   insisting that Obama produce certified documentation that he is or is not a
   “natural born”citizen and if he cannot produce documentation that Obama be
   removed from the ballot for President.

   Berg’s case, Berg vs. Obama was dismissed from the United States District
   Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Docket # 08-cv-4083 for lack
   of standing. This is a question of who has standing to uphold our
   Constitution. If I don’t have standing, if you don’t have standing, if your
   neighbor doesn’t have standing to question the eligibility of an individual
   to be President of the United States – the Commander-in-Chief, the most
   powerful person in the world – then who does?

   What happened to ‘…Government of the people, by the people, for the
   people,…’ Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863.

   We must legally prevent Obama, the unqualified candidate, from taking the
   Office of the Presidency of the United States,”Berg said.

   Our website obamacrimes.com now has 86.1 + million hits.

   Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, “we”
   the people, are heading to a “Constitutional Crisis”if this case is not
   resolved forthwith.

   * * For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com

   # # #

   Philip J. Berg, Esquire
   555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
   Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
   Cell (610) 662-3005
   (610) 825-3134
   (800) 993-PHIL [7445]
   Fax (610) 834-7659
   philjberg@obamacrimes.comThis e-mail address is being protected from
   spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
   POST COMMENTS

5. tim
   November 3, 2008 - 04:11 PM on November 3rd, 2008

   Today on my way to lunch I passed a homeless guy with a sign that read “Vote Obama, I need the money.” I laughed.
   Once in the restaurant my server had on a “Obama 08″ tie, again I laughed as he had given away his political preference–just imagine the coincidence.
   this is so brief and yet, powerfully communicates the communist ideals of the demoNcratic party …. check thisWhen the bill came I decided not to tip the server and explained to him that I was applying the Obama redistribution of wealth concept he was obviously supporting. He stood there in disbelief while I told him that I was going to redistribute his tip to someone who I deemed more in need — the homeless guy outside. The server angrily stormed from my sight.I went outside, gave the homeless guy $10 and told him to thank the server inside as I’ve decided he could use the money more. The homeless guy was grateful.At the end of my rather unscientific redistribution experiment I realized the homeless guy was grateful for the money he did not earn, but the waiter was pretty angry that I gave away the money he did earn even though the actual recipient needed money more.I guess redistribution of wealth is an easier thing to swallow in concept than in practical applicationpass it

6. Bo
   November 4, 2008 - 03:16 PM on November 4th, 2008

   I think this could be a revised plan first considered by ‘Homeland Security’. Personally, 2008-09 is a different world than it was in 1978. I don’t trust my neighbors, much of my family, or people at work these days because they don’t act human and act like zombies trying to convince me I should be afraid about every little thing. This experiment didn’t fly with the Salem witch hunt and failed in Nazi Germany. Tragic! As a Christian, I find this sad and against God’s order of doing things…

7. JB
   November 6, 2008 - 06:17 PM on November 6th, 2008

   If you do not live in New York then you might not be familiar with army troops manning the subway and Metro-North stations when the terror alert goes orange. The well funded civilian security force Barack is talking about is called the local Police, State Police and FBI. I believe, as he does that having soldiers and National Guardsmen walking the streets and occupying civilian facilities is obscene, wasteful and downright un-American. That’s why we had a bloody revolution for God’s sake.

8. therockofages
   November 29, 2008 - 01:52 PM on November 29th, 2008

   Every time I read something about ‘change’ these days, I find myself thinking in analogies.  Remember the movie ‘Aliens’ when the dispatch team was coming back to the mother ship with the ‘alien’ securely fastened to crewmember Cain’s face?  Ripley insisted they must stay in quarantine until it could be determined what it was; according to basic space quarantine laws.  But the duplicitous science officer, Ash, decided to open the airlock doors and allow them in anyway.  Later, Ripley confronts Ash after it was well known the nefarious and dangerous alien was not ‘very good for their health or freedom’.  As Ash was in his laboratory examining the skeleton remains of the now re-released ‘bad alien’, she asked Ash ‘and how is our visitor was doing’?  Ash meekly replies the alien has turned out to be a very nasty son-of-a-bitch, not easily caught or dealt with.  At which point Ripley says, ‘and you let him in’.  The same goes with unwanted house guests, or aliens.  Once they get inside your house, they are difficult to remove.

Leave a Reply

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

Right Voices uses Gravatar to display individual comment author icons. If you'd like your own icon next to your name, then go to Gravatar.com and sign up - it's easy!

more »

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail