He says he supports the Second Amendment, but votes against allowing people to defend themselves in their own homes, speaks out against concealed carry permits, and advocates the banning of all Semi automatic firearms and all handguns. That’s NOT supporting the Second Amendment. 

He claims to be pro life, then votes 4 times to deny medical assistance to babies who survive a botched abortion attempt and says that deciding when a child receives basic human rights is “Above his paygrade”.  I’m not anti abortion, but there is something wrong with putting the woman’s right to decide to have an abortion above the right of a living child to medical attention is just wrong.

He claims that he wants to spread the wealth (a classic Marxist claim) but makes millions while his aunt lives in the US illegally (as an attorney couldn’t he have at least filed an appeal and acted as her sponsor?) in public housing. His half brother live in a hut in Kenya on less than $1 a month. I guess he wants to spread someone else’s wealth.

He lacks the basic business acumen to understand the impact of raising taxes on businesses that has been shown time and again. Taxes are a business expense, and not a productive one. The single largest expense that any company has other than cost of goods sold is payroll. Payroll is the single largest controllable expense. That being said, whenever a business is hit with an uncontrollable increase in expenses such as increased tax rates, Payroll has to be reduced to make up the difference. How do you reduce payroll? You eliminate (FIRE) employees. (This increases UNEMPLOYMENT RATES) Once you have eliminated as many employees as possible without impact revenues, you must increase revenues to make up any shortfall between your revenues and expenses. The only way to do that is to raise prices. (This is called INFLATION.) A company has to be careful about raising prices too significantly because sales will drop off if the price becomes too high. It’s called the point of diminishing returns. The business tax rate increases that Obama is proposing WILL result in higher unemployment and higher prices. To stimulate the economy, lower tax rates are much more effective. Because of the increased productivity resulting from the lower tax rates, the government will actually receive MORE revenues. That’s not rocket science, simple historical fact. Tax rates in this country have surpassed the point of diminishing returns. As we are currently bringing in far more revenues to the government than during the Clinton administration, the two causes of a deficit are the necessity of actually funding the military, and the wasteful spending of Congress (both parties are to blame). When record revenues come in but are exceeded by expenditures (lots of pork), the problem isn’t with the revenue generation end, it’s with the spending end. Too much spending is the problem, not too little.

http://www.wc.com/attorney-GregoryCraig.html – 23k

A trial lawyer with extensive experience in a wide variety of cases, Greg Craig has successfully defended individuals and entities in a number of high-profile criminal and civil proceedings.
Civil Litigation: Examples of Mr. Craig’s civil litigation experience include the following:
In 2000, Mr. Craig successfully represented Elian Gonzalez’s father, Mr. Juan Miguel Gonzalez, in administrative and court proceedings involving Mr. Gonzalez’s effort to regain custody of his son, Elian. Also in 2000, Mr. Craig helped lead the trial team representing Warnaco in contract/license litigation with Calvin Klein and his company. In 1999, Mr. Craig represented a major corporation in a trial in which a senior executive brought suit against the company alleging age discrimination. Most recently, Mr. Craig represented the UN Secretary General Kofi Annan in connection with the Volcker Commission’s investigation of the Oil-for-Food Programme at the U.N.
During the last fifteen years, Mr. Craig has represented a variety of foreign individuals and entities who have required advice and assistance with various U.S. government agencies, to list just a few: the Consular Bureau in the State Department, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the Office of Foreign Asset Control in the Treasury Department, and the Securities and Exchange Commission. For example, Mr. Craig represented two Chicago policemen in extradition proceedings in federal court in Chicago and brought a declaratory judgment action on their behalf in federal court in Washington, D.C. which resulted in a trial court ruling declaring the U.S. extradition statute of 1856 unconstitutional.
From 1978 to 1979, Mr. Craig represented Alexander Solzhenitsyn in a libel case in federal court in San Francisco. In 1977, he brought suit on behalf of one of the first (and lead) plaintiffs in the swine flu litigation that was subsequently consolidated by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. From 1973 to 1975, working with Edward Bennett Williams, Mr. Craig represented the clubs of the National Hockey League in antitrust litigation involving the World Hockey Association. From 1972 to 1974, working with Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Mr. Craig represented the Washington Post Company and various reporters in connection with the Watergate scandal and the grand jury investigation of Vice President Spiro Agnew.
Criminal Litigation: Examples of Mr. Craig’s criminal litigation experience include the following:
Mr. Craig has represented numerous American corporations and corporate executives who have been the subjects of grand jury investigations and/or who have also been charged with criminal offenses.
In 1990, Mr. Craig represented Senator Edward M. Kennedy as a witness in the trial of his nephew, William Kennedy Smith, in Palm Beach, Florida. In 1983 to 1984, working with Edward Bennett Williams, Mr. Craig represented a prominent businessman who was charged with tax evasion in federal court in Miami. In 1981 to 1982, working with Vince Fuller, Mr. Craig represented John Hinckley who was charged with the attempted assassination of President Reagan. In 1978 to 1980, also with Edward Bennett Williams, Mr. Craig represented a prominent businessman charged with bribing a D.C. government official. In 1977, he represented the first FBI agent ever to be indicted, who was accused of illegal wiretapping, breaking and entering, and mail opening in connection with the FBI investigation of the Weather Underground. That same year, working with Edward Bennett Williams, Mr. Craig represented a former Director of Central Intelligence, who was under grand jury investigation for perjury in his 1973 testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. In 1975, he represented an individual charged with arson in a six week trial in federal court in Connecticut.
Other Experience: In three stints away from Williams & Connolly LLP, Mr. Craig has served in government in a variety of capacities:
In September 1998, President Clinton appointed Mr. Craig to be Assistant to the President and Special Counsel in the White House where Mr. Craig served as quarterback of the President’s team that was assembled to defend against impeachment. Mr. Craig was also a member of the President’s trial team in the United States Senate and presented the President’s defense with respect to Count One during that trial.
In 1997, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright appointed Mr. Craig to be one of her senior advisors, and he served the Secretary as her Director of Policy Planning during the years 1997 to 1998.
For five years (1984-1988), he served as Senator Edward Kennedy’s Senior Advisor on Defense, Foreign Policy and National Security issues.
Mr. Craig also has taught trial practice at both Yale Law School (1975-1976) and Harvard Law School (1981-1984).