<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Right Voices &#187; Elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightvoices.com/category/elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightvoices.com</link>
	<description>in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 21:38:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>UPDATED: IRS chief: Buy health insurance or lose your tax refund</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2010/04/06/irs-chief-buy-health-insurance-or-lose-your-tax-refund/</link>
		<comments>http://rightvoices.com/2010/04/06/irs-chief-buy-health-insurance-or-lose-your-tax-refund/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government-Run Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midterm Elections 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Shulman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ezra Klein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Service]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=14886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/04/06/irs-chief-buy-health-insurance-or-lose-your-tax-refund/" title="UPDATED: IRS chief: Buy health insurance or lose your tax refund "></a>IRS chief: Buy health insurance or lose your tax refund &#124; The Daily Caller &#8211; Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment. Individuals who don’t purchase health insurance may lose their tax refunds according to IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman. After acknowledging &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/04/06/irs-chief-buy-health-insurance-or-lose-your-tax-refund/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/04/06/irs-chief-buy-health-insurance-or-lose-your-tax-refund/" title="UPDATED: IRS chief: Buy health insurance or lose your tax refund "></a><p><a href="http://dailycaller.com/2010/04/05/irs-chief-buy-health-insurance-or-lose-your-tax-refund/">IRS chief: Buy health insurance or lose your tax refund | The Daily Caller &#8211; Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Individuals who don’t purchase health insurance may lose their tax  refunds according to IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman. After acknowledging  the recently passed health-care bill limits the agency’s options for  enforcing the individual mandate, Shulman told reporters that the most  likely way to penalize individuals that don’t comply is by reducing or  confiscating their tax refunds.</p>
<p>Speaking at the National Press Club on Monday, Shulman downplayed the  IRS’s role in enforcing the recent overhaul of the health insurance  industry by claiming the agency would not aggressively target  individuals who don’t purchase coverage. He noted that the health-care  bill expressly forbids the agency from freezing bank accounts, seizing  assets or pursuing criminal charges, but when pressed said the IRS would  most likely use tax refund offsets to penalize those that don’t comply  with the mandate. The IRS uses refund offsets to collect from  individuals that owe the federal government a delinquent debt.</p></blockquote>
<div id="TixyyLink" style="overflow: hidden; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;">Read more:  <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2010/04/05/irs-chief-buy-health-insurance-or-lose-your-tax-refund/#ixzz0kKXU1Z15">http://dailycaller.com/2010/04/05/irs-chief-buy-health-insurance-or-lose-your-tax-refund/#ixzz0kKXU1Z15</a></div>
<div style="overflow: hidden; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;"><strong>UPDATE 1</strong>: From the <strong>Journal of Accountancy</strong> are 2 great articles for you to read&#8230;</div>
<div style="overflow: hidden; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;">
<h4><a href="http://www.journalofaccountancy.com/Issues/2010/Apr/20102509.htm">Tax  From the Top: Q&amp;A With IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman</a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://www.journalofaccountancy.com/Issues/2010/May/20102731.htm">Health  Care Reform Reshapes Tax Code</a></h4>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rightvoices.com/2010/04/06/irs-chief-buy-health-insurance-or-lose-your-tax-refund/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats Could Not Wait For CBO Score, So They Scored It Themselves..</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2010/03/18/democrats-could-not-wait-for-cbo-score-so-they-scored-it-themselves/</link>
		<comments>http://rightvoices.com/2010/03/18/democrats-could-not-wait-for-cbo-score-so-they-scored-it-themselves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midterm Elections 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=14880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/03/18/democrats-could-not-wait-for-cbo-score-so-they-scored-it-themselves/" title="Democrats Could Not Wait For CBO Score, So They Scored It Themselves.."></a>Hot Air » Blog Archive » What’s taking the CBO so long for its analysis? Update: $940 billion?. You see, they chose that number because it puts it just under the TRILLION dollar(s) figure that we know will be scored &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/03/18/democrats-could-not-wait-for-cbo-score-so-they-scored-it-themselves/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/03/18/democrats-could-not-wait-for-cbo-score-so-they-scored-it-themselves/" title="Democrats Could Not Wait For CBO Score, So They Scored It Themselves.."></a><p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2010/03/18/whats-taking-the-cbo-so-long-for-its-analysis/">Hot Air » Blog Archive » What’s taking the CBO so long for its analysis? Update: $940 billion?</a>.</p>
<p>You see, they chose that number because it puts it just under the TRILLION dollar(s) figure that we know will be scored by the CBO..</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t get a chance to post this, but out of the all the crap spewed by NoBama yesterday, this was the most honest portion:</p>
<h3><a title="Permanent Link to Obama on Slaughter strategy: “I  don’t spend a lot of time worrying about what the … rules are”;  &lt;font color=red&gt;Update: “Combative” video added&lt;/font&gt;" rel="bookmark" href="http://hotair.com/archives/2010/03/17/obama-on-slaughter-strategy-i-dont-spend-a-lot-of-time-worrying-about-what-the-rules-are/">Obama  on Slaughter strategy: “I don’t spend a lot of time worrying about what  the … rules are”; <span style="color: red;">Update: “Combative” video added</span></a></h3>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rightvoices.com/2010/03/18/democrats-could-not-wait-for-cbo-score-so-they-scored-it-themselves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If You Can&#8217;t Beat Them..Join Them: Pelosi and the Tea Party &#8216;Share Views&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/28/if-you-cant-beat-them-join-them-pelosi-and-the-tea-party-share-views/</link>
		<comments>http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/28/if-you-cant-beat-them-join-them-pelosi-and-the-tea-party-share-views/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midterm Elections 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=14861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/28/if-you-cant-beat-them-join-them-pelosi-and-the-tea-party-share-views/" title="If You Can&#039;t Beat Them..Join Them: Pelosi and the Tea Party &#039;Share Views&#039;"></a>In a “This Week” interview with ABC’s Elizabeth Vargas, Pelosi said, “We share some of the views of the Tea Partiers in terms of the role of special interest in Washington, D.C., as &#8212; it just has to stop.  And &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/28/if-you-cant-beat-them-join-them-pelosi-and-the-tea-party-share-views/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/28/if-you-cant-beat-them-join-them-pelosi-and-the-tea-party-share-views/" title="If You Can&#039;t Beat Them..Join Them: Pelosi and the Tea Party &#039;Share Views&#039;"></a><p><a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2010/02/pelosi-and-the-tea-party-share-views.html">In a “This Week” interview with ABC’s Elizabeth Vargas, Pelosi said</a>,</p>
<blockquote><p>“We  share some of the views of the Tea Partiers in terms of the role of  special interest in Washington, D.C., as &#8212; it just has to stop.  And  that&#8217;s why I&#8217;ve fought the special interest, whether it&#8217;s on energy,  whether it&#8217;s on health insurance, whether it&#8217;s on pharmaceuticals and  the rest.”</p>
<p>Pelosi held to her skepticism about what is behind the  movement.  “Some of it is orchestrated from the Republican  headquarters,” Pelosi said.  She also added that, “Some of it is  hijacking the good intentions of lots of people who share some of our  concerns that we have about the role of special interests.”</p></blockquote>
<p>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA</p>
<p>HA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/28/if-you-cant-beat-them-join-them-pelosi-and-the-tea-party-share-views/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fannie and Freddie are at it again</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/18/fannie-and-freddie-are-at-it-again/</link>
		<comments>http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/18/fannie-and-freddie-are-at-it-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midterm Elections 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus Bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=14851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/18/fannie-and-freddie-are-at-it-again/" title="Fannie and Freddie are at it again "></a>Fannie and Freddie are at it again &#124; The Daily Caller &#8211; Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment. &#8211; Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are dating again. And word has it they’re seeing way too much of each other. Because &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/18/fannie-and-freddie-are-at-it-again/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/18/fannie-and-freddie-are-at-it-again/" title="Fannie and Freddie are at it again "></a><p><a href="http://dailycaller.com/2010/02/18/fannie-and-freddie-are-at-it-again/?utm_source=MadMimi&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_content=The+DC+Morning&amp;utm_campaign=Daily+Email&amp;utm_term=Richard+Olivastro%3A+Fannie+and+Freddie+are+at+it+again">Fannie and Freddie are at it again | The Daily Caller &#8211; Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8211; Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are dating again. And word has it they’re seeing way too much of each other. Because their Congressional “parents” cannot be totally unaware of what Fannie and Freddie have been up to, individual incumbents in both chambers are either consciously avoiding their personal oversight responsibility—to provide adult supervision—or, may actually condone the various schemes carried out by the two government-controlled mortgage finance companies</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/18/fannie-and-freddie-are-at-it-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bayh Gone Days To Come</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/15/the-bayh-gone-days-to-come/</link>
		<comments>http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/15/the-bayh-gone-days-to-come/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 02:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midterm Elections 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bayh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=14842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/15/the-bayh-gone-days-to-come/" title="The Bayh Gone Days To Come"></a>Bayh is out.. Bayh to Obama: take this job and shove it. Is Senator Mikulski of Maryland the next to retire?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/15/the-bayh-gone-days-to-come/" title="The Bayh Gone Days To Come"></a><p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/15/breaking-bayh-will-retire/">Bayh is out</a>.. <strong><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/postpartisan/2010/02/evan_bayh.html" target="_self">Bayh to Obama: take this job and shove it.<br />
</a></strong> Is <strong>Senator Mikulski of Maryland</strong> <a href="http://ace.mu.nu/archives/298347.php">the next to retire</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/15/the-bayh-gone-days-to-come/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patrick Kennedy Will NOT Stay In Election He Is Slated To Lose</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/11/patrick-kennedy-will-stay-in-election-he-is-slated-to-lose/</link>
		<comments>http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/11/patrick-kennedy-will-stay-in-election-he-is-slated-to-lose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 03:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midterm Elections 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Kennedy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=14836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/11/patrick-kennedy-will-stay-in-election-he-is-slated-to-lose/" title="Patrick Kennedy Will NOT Stay In Election He Is Slated To Lose"></a>Here is what he had to say back in January: As election returns came in Tuesday night, Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-R.I.) said it&#8217;s clear that voters wanted “a whipping boy” for all the lost jobs and foreclosed homes. “It’s like &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/11/patrick-kennedy-will-stay-in-election-he-is-slated-to-lose/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/11/patrick-kennedy-will-stay-in-election-he-is-slated-to-lose/" title="Patrick Kennedy Will NOT Stay In Election He Is Slated To Lose"></a><p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/31700.html">Here is what he had to say back in January</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>As election returns came in Tuesday night, Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-R.I.) said it&#8217;s clear that voters wanted “a whipping boy” for all the lost jobs and foreclosed homes.</p>
<p>“It’s like in Roman times, they’d be trotted out to the coliseum and the lions would be brought out,” Kennedy told reporters at the Capitol on Tuesday night. “I mean, they’re wanting blood and they’re not getting it so they want to protest, and, you know, you can’t blame them. But frankly, the fact is we inherited this mess and it’s becoming ours.”</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2010/02/dem-official-patrick-kennedy-not-seeking-reelection.html">And today</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Rep. Patrick Kennedy has decided not to seek re-election to Congress, saying his life is &#8220;taking a new direction.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Hopefully the direction is not toward a bottle of booze or pills&#8230; Don&#8217;t let the door hit you where the good lord split you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/11/patrick-kennedy-will-stay-in-election-he-is-slated-to-lose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House Overplays Hand</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/09/white-house-overplays-hand/</link>
		<comments>http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/09/white-house-overplays-hand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midterm Elections 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Gibbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarah palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=14825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/09/white-house-overplays-hand/" title="White House Overplays Hand"></a>White House Hits Palin with Open Hand Slap &#124; TMZ.com. Just a reminder People will complain that this is petty and beneath the dignity of the office, but (a) Gibbs partly redeems himself by winking at the ubiquity of their &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/09/white-house-overplays-hand/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/09/white-house-overplays-hand/" title="White House Overplays Hand"></a><p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.tmz.com/2010/02/09/white-house-sarah-palin-robert-gibbs-notes-hand/"><img src='http://rightvoices.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/0209_robert_gibbs_ap_02.jpg' alt='' /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.tmz.com/2010/02/09/white-house-sarah-palin-robert-gibbs-notes-hand/">White House Hits Palin with Open Hand Slap | TMZ.com</a>.</p>
<p>Just a <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/09/video-gibbs-writing-on-his-hand-now-to-mock-palin/">reminder </a></p>
<blockquote><p>People will complain that this is petty and beneath the dignity of the office, but (a) Gibbs partly redeems himself by winking at the ubiquity of their moronic “hope” and “change” buzzwords, (b) Palin <em>is</em> an <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/09/brennan-our-critics-are-helping-al-qaeda/">Al Qaeda accomplice</a>, so she sort of had it coming, and (c) as we’ve discussed before, the White House press briefing is one of the <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/gibbs-can-you-imagine-if-five-years-ago-protesters-had-compared-our-government-to-hitler/">lamest, most useless spectacles</a> in American politics. <strong>How can this be beneath the dignity of an office that has no dignity to begin with? </strong>The only time the briefing’s worth watching is when Gibbs is forced to defend something especially stupid that Biden said, or when something bad’s happened in the Middle East that sets Helen Thomas up for a “question” about whether we maybe had it coming. Lacking either of those contingencies, if the guy wants to resort to some hackish partisan Mencia-esque schtick to liven things up, I say go crazy.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/09/white-house-overplays-hand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama’s economic blueprint is based on rosy assumptions and political impossibilities</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/02/obama%e2%80%99s-economic-blueprint-is-based-on-rosy-assumptions-and-political-impossibilities/</link>
		<comments>http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/02/obama%e2%80%99s-economic-blueprint-is-based-on-rosy-assumptions-and-political-impossibilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midterm Elections 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax  cuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=14808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/02/obama%e2%80%99s-economic-blueprint-is-based-on-rosy-assumptions-and-political-impossibilities/" title="Obama’s economic blueprint is based on rosy assumptions and political impossibilities"></a>Ignore the Sham Budget The real action will have to be next year, after the mid-term elections. But even then, it’s not clear whether our political system can deal with the crisis of deficits and debt, or whether it will &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/02/obama%e2%80%99s-economic-blueprint-is-based-on-rosy-assumptions-and-political-impossibilities/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/02/obama%e2%80%99s-economic-blueprint-is-based-on-rosy-assumptions-and-political-impossibilities/" title="Obama’s economic blueprint is based on rosy assumptions and political impossibilities"></a><h4><a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-02-01/ignore-the-sham-budget/">Ignore the Sham Budget</a></h4>
<blockquote><p>The real action will have to be next year, after the mid-term elections. But even then, it’s not clear whether our political system can deal with the crisis of deficits and debt, or whether it will take our foreign creditors, on whose lending we are totally hooked, to administer the shock we need to get our financial foundation on a sound footing. I suspect the latter. They wouldn’t have to do much, just a few public pronouncements in Beijing that China’s central bank plans to invest excess reserves in a different way than it did in the past. In other words, there would not have to be withdrawals of foreign investments, just no increases to feed our ever-growing needs, to induce widespread panic in the markets and in Washington.</p>
<p>If I suspended my instincts about how the crisis would ultimately be resolved, and make an assumption that our political system could rise to the occasion—an assumption of historic proportions—what would Washington have to do?</p></blockquote>
<p>When you are finished reading that link, go to this <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/partnersfeed/?cid=csi:cheatsheet&amp;f=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2010%2F02%2F02%2Fbusiness%2F02regulate.html%3Fref%3Dtodayspaper">NYT article</a> about the &#8216;Volcker Rule&#8217;..another must read</p>
<blockquote><p>“I think it’s confused the issue considerably, because he’s basically fanned the fires of populism and in a lot of instances, populism doesn’t give you either good regulatory activity or strong markets.”</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rightvoices.com/2010/02/02/obama%e2%80%99s-economic-blueprint-is-based-on-rosy-assumptions-and-political-impossibilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>THRILL IS GONE</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2010/01/23/thrill-is-gone/</link>
		<comments>http://rightvoices.com/2010/01/23/thrill-is-gone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Automotive Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Three Automakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government-Run Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midterm Elections 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus Bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subprime Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Healthcare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=14790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/01/23/thrill-is-gone/" title="THRILL IS GONE"></a>In Ohio, Obama vows to &#8216;never stop fighting&#8217; PAPER: Obama's fortunes set to deteriorate further... Bernanke under pressure; Faltering support for Fed chief... Dow Suffers Worst Week SInce Last March... Obama seen as anti-business by 77% of investors... Europe welcomes &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/01/23/thrill-is-gone/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/01/23/thrill-is-gone/" title="THRILL IS GONE"></a><h4><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/22/obama.ohio/index.html?section=cnn_latest">In Ohio, Obama vows to &#8216;never stop fighting&#8217;</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.drudgereport.com/"><img src='http://rightvoices.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/r2374341158.jpg' alt='' /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: left;">
</h4>
<h4><tt><strong><tt><strong><a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/821dce96-0786-11df-915f-00144feabdc0.html">PAPER:  Obama's fortunes set to deteriorate further...</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/3831df1c-0780-11df-915f-00144feabdc0.html">Bernanke under pressure;  Faltering support for Fed chief...</a><br />
<a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/35013432">Dow Suffers Worst Week SInce Last March...</a><br />
<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20100121/pl_bloomberg/a8uii1bcrdmy">Obama seen as anti-business by 77% of investors...</a><br />
<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100122/bs_nm/us_obama_financials_25">Europe welcomes bank plan, won't imitate it...</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/821dce96-0786-11df-915f-00144feabdc0.html">White House nightmare persists...</a> <!-- Left Main headlines links END --> </strong></tt></strong></tt></h4>
<p><tt><strong> <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll">RASMUSSEN:<br />
Obama Approval Index: -19<br />
Strongly Approve          24%<br />
Strongly Disapprove     43%<br />
Total Approval               44% </a> </strong></tt></p>
<hr /><tt><strong><a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20100123/D9DD6LEG0.html">Banks shut in FL, MO, NM, OR, WA... </a> </strong></tt></p>
<hr /><tt><strong><a href="http://www.politico.com/livepulse/0110/As_health_care_cools_Senate_Dems_tackle_jobs.html">Dodd: Dems might need a month off from reform...</a> </strong></tt></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rightvoices.com/2010/01/23/thrill-is-gone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE DAY HEALTH CARE DIED</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2010/01/21/the-day-health-care-died/</link>
		<comments>http://rightvoices.com/2010/01/21/the-day-health-care-died/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government-Run Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midterm Elections 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus Bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subprime Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Healthcare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=14783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/01/21/the-day-health-care-died/" title="THE DAY HEALTH CARE DIED "></a>THE DAY HEALTH CARE DIED Many rank-and-file Democrats said their stunning defeat in this week&#8217;s Massachusetts special election — in which Republicans captured the Senate seat held for decades by the late Edward Kennedy — meant it was time to &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/01/21/the-day-health-care-died/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://rightvoices.com/2010/01/21/the-day-health-care-died/" title="THE DAY HEALTH CARE DIED "></a><p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.drudgereport.com/"><img src='http://rightvoices.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/np.jpg' alt='' /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100121/ap_on_bi_ge/us_health_care_overhaul">THE DAY HEALTH CARE DIED</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Many rank-and-file Democrats said their stunning defeat in this week&#8217;s Massachusetts special election — in which Republicans captured the Senate seat held for decades by the late <span id="lw_1264105231_4" class="yshortcuts" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed #0066cc; background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; cursor: pointer;">Edward Kennedy</span> — meant it was time to seek more modest health legislation.</p>
<p>It would be &#8220;problematic&#8221; to persuade House members to approve the Senate measure, Pelosi said, though Democrats haven&#8217;t completely ruled out trying to do so. Many of them say the Senate bill does too little to help people afford <span id="lw_1264105231_5" class="yshortcuts" style="background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; cursor: pointer;">health coverage</span>.</p>
<p>&#8220;In its present form without any changes I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s possible to pass the Senate bill in the House,&#8221; Pelosi said, adding, &#8220;I don&#8217;t see the votes for it at this time.&#8221;</p>
<p>Any effort to reshape the health legislation could well be a lengthy process — despite Democrats&#8217; desire for a quick election-year pivot to address jobs and the economy, which polls show are the public&#8217;s top concern. Lawmakers have already been working on the issue for a year.</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re not in a big rush&#8221; on health care, Pelosi said. &#8220;Pause, reflect.&#8221;</p>
<p>Several Democrats said they should refocus the legislation onto popular proposals like barring insurance companies from denying coverage to sick people.</p></blockquote>
<p>via <a href="http://www.drudgereport.com/">DRUDGE REPORT 2010®</a>.</p>
<p><tt><strong><tt><strong><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/34976113">WALL ST CHILLED...</a><br />
<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Initial-jobless-claims-apf-3027105474.html?x=0&amp;.v=5">MORE JOBS LOST...</a><br />
<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100120/ap_on_bi_ge/us_congress_debt_limit_11">Democrats propose $1.9 trillion increase in debt limit...</a> <!-- Left Main headlines links END --><br />
</strong></tt></strong></tt></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rightvoices.com/2010/01/21/the-day-health-care-died/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

