<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Right Voices &#187; Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightvoices.com/category/issues/supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightvoices.com</link>
	<description>in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:51:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Obama to extend benefits to gay federal workers</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2009/06/16/obama-to-extend-benefits-to-gay-federal-workers/</link>
		<comments>http://rightvoices.com/2009/06/16/obama-to-extend-benefits-to-gay-federal-workers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=14049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama to extend benefits to gay federal workers
President Barack Obama plans to extend health care and other benefits to the gay and lesbian partners of federal employees. White House officials say Obama plans to announce decision on Wednesday in the Oval Office. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity because the president had not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gjAXvDL7otQK2aKqlWOvi89gQ-xQD98S3TCO0">Obama to extend benefits to gay federal workers</a></p>
<blockquote><p>President Barack Obama plans to extend health care and other benefits to the gay and lesbian partners of federal employees. White House officials say Obama plans to announce decision on Wednesday in the Oval Office. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity because the president had not yet made the announcement.</p>
<p>The move would give partners of federal employees access to health care and financial benefits such as relocation fees for moves. Officials say Obama would detail more details of the decision on Wednesday.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rightvoices.com/2009/06/16/obama-to-extend-benefits-to-gay-federal-workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court rejects challenge to &#8216;don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2009/06/08/court-rejects-challenge-to-dont-ask-dont-tell/</link>
		<comments>http://rightvoices.com/2009/06/08/court-rejects-challenge-to-dont-ask-dont-tell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 02:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Troops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA['don't ask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don't tell']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=14008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Court rejects challenge to &#8216;don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8217;.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98MHV380&amp;show_article=1">Court rejects challenge to &#8216;don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8217;</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rightvoices.com/2009/06/08/court-rejects-challenge-to-dont-ask-dont-tell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hot Air » Blog Archive » Breaking: SCOTUS stops Chrysler sale</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2009/06/08/hot-air-%c2%bb-blog-archive-%c2%bb-breaking-scotus-stops-chrysler-sale/</link>
		<comments>http://rightvoices.com/2009/06/08/hot-air-%c2%bb-blog-archive-%c2%bb-breaking-scotus-stops-chrysler-sale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Automotive Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=14004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hot Air » Blog Archive » Breaking: SCOTUS stops Chrysler sale.
Chrysler has said a delay could scuttle the deal.
A federal appeals court in New York had earlier approved the sale, but gave opponents until 4 p.m. EDT Monday to try to get the Supreme Court to intervene.
Ginsburg issued her order just before 4 p.m., when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/08/breaking-scotus-stops-chrysler-sale/">Hot Air » Blog Archive » Breaking: SCOTUS stops Chrysler sale</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Chrysler has said a delay could scuttle the deal.</p>
<p>A federal appeals court in New York had earlier approved the sale, but gave opponents until 4 p.m. EDT Monday to try to get the Supreme Court to intervene.</p>
<p>Ginsburg issued her order just before 4 p.m., when Chrysler would have been free to complete the sale of most of its assets to Fiat.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rightvoices.com/2009/06/08/hot-air-%c2%bb-blog-archive-%c2%bb-breaking-scotus-stops-chrysler-sale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PREZ GETS A LIBERAL DOSE OF DEM DURBIN</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2009/05/27/prez-gets-a-liberal-dose-of-dem-durbin/</link>
		<comments>http://rightvoices.com/2009/05/27/prez-gets-a-liberal-dose-of-dem-durbin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 12:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judiciary Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miguel Estrada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonia Sotomayor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=13889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PREZ GETS A LIBERAL DOSE OF DEM DURBIN &#8211; New York Post.
WHISPERING in President Obama&#8217;s ear is one of the most ruthlessly effective masters of identity politics in America &#8212; and the nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the high court is his ultimate victory.
Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin &#8212; one of Obama&#8217;s earliest confidants and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/05272009/news/columnists/prez_gets_a_liberal_dose_of_dem_durbin_171109.htm">PREZ GETS A LIBERAL DOSE OF DEM DURBIN &#8211; New York Post</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>WHISPERING in President Obama&#8217;s ear is one of the most ruthlessly effective masters of identity politics in America &#8212; and the nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the high court is his ultimate victory.</p>
<p>Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin &#8212; one of Obama&#8217;s earliest confidants and promoters &#8212; is an accomplished veteran of the federal judiciary wars.</p>
<p>An influential member of the Senate Judiciary Committee and now the No. 2 Democrat in the Senate, Durbin has always been among the most brazen about using federal judgeships to promote the political and demographic goals of the Democratic Party.</p>
<p>Operating under close direction from liberal lobbyists, Durbin and fellow Democrats have worked to fill the federal courts with judges who rule most reliably in favor of the party&#8217;s top donors and supporters such as trial lawyers, labor unions and abortion-rights groups.</p>
<p>At the same time, Durbin and his fellow warriors also have used federal judgeships to advance their party&#8217;s dominance among certain demographic groups &#8212; especially Hispanics, the nation&#8217;s fastest-growing minority.</p>
<p><em>This has meant not only promoting minority judges, but also thwarting those nominated by Republicans. </em></p>
<p>No case has been more blatant than the 2001 nomination of Miguel Estrada, who was picked for the federal appeals court by former President George W. Bush.</p>
<p>When nominated to the appeals court, it was widely speculated that he was being groomed to become the first Hispanic nominated to the Supreme Court.</p>
<p><em>But liberal lobbyists, Durbin staffers wrote their boss in a secret memo that later became public, identified Estrada as especially dangerous, because &#8220;he has a minimal paper trail, he is Latino, and the White House seems to be grooming him for a Supreme Court appointment.&#8221; </em></p>
<p>Durbin and his fellow Democrats put Estrada on ice and eventually the respected jurist asked for his nomination to be withdrawn.</p>
<p><em>Now comes Sonia Sotomayor, who stands to become the first Hispanic to sit on the Supreme Court. But, unlike Estrada before her, she doesn&#8217;t share his discomfort with allowing the federal courts to legislate from the bench to the benefit of liberal interests. </em></p>
<p><em> In other words, <strong>Durbin and his fellow Democrats on the Judiciary Committee are all in favor of promoting Hispanic nominees within the federal judiciary &#8212; just so long as they think the way they&#8217;re supposed to.</strong></em></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rightvoices.com/2009/05/27/prez-gets-a-liberal-dose-of-dem-durbin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California high court upholds gay marriage ban</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2009/05/26/california-high-court-upholds-gay-marriage-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://rightvoices.com/2009/05/26/california-high-court-upholds-gay-marriage-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=13886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The court said the people have a right, through the ballot box, to change their constitution. 
&#8220;In a sense, petitioners&#8217; and the attorney general&#8217;s complaint is that it is just too easy to amend the California constitution through the initiative process. But it is not a proper function of this court to curtail that process; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="lingo_region"><a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98E2DO00&amp;show_article=1">The court said the people have a right, through the ballot box, to change their constitution. </a></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;In a sense, petitioners&#8217; and the attorney general&#8217;s complaint is that it is just too easy to amend the California constitution through the initiative process. But it is not a proper function of this court to curtail that process; we are constitutionally bound to uphold it,&#8221; the ruling said.</p></blockquote>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rightvoices.com/2009/05/26/california-high-court-upholds-gay-marriage-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yes NBC, Republicans Would Dare To Vote Against This Hispanic</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2009/05/26/yes-nbc-republicans-would-dare-to-vote-against-this-hispanic/</link>
		<comments>http://rightvoices.com/2009/05/26/yes-nbc-republicans-would-dare-to-vote-against-this-hispanic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 14:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Sotomayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supremem Court Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=13882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NBC:  Would Republicans dare vote against first Hispanic?
Yes, they would if the Hispanic has a record like this:
Judge Sotomayor is a liberal judicial activist of the first order who thinks her own personal political agenda is more important that the law as written.  She thinks that judges should dictate policy, and that one&#8217;s sex, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span><tt><strong><tt><strong><a href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/"><span style="color: red;">NBC:  Would Republicans dare vote against first Hispanic?</span></a></strong></tt></strong></tt></span></p>
<p><span><strong></strong><strong>Yes, they would if the Hispanic has <a href="http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=OTU0NGI5MTFjYWI0MWQ2ZGFlMWY5NjBjMzY2YWQyZTI=">a record like this</a>:</strong></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Judge Sotomayor is a liberal judicial activist of the first order who thinks her own personal political agenda is more important that the law as written.  She thinks that judges should dictate policy, and that one&#8217;s sex, race, and ethnicity ought to affect the decisions one renders from the bench.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>She reads racial preferences and quotas into the Constitution, even to the point of dishonoring those who preserve our public safety.  On September 11, America saw firsthand the vital role of America&#8217;s firefighters in protecting our citizens.  They put their lives on the line for her and the other citizens of New York and the nation.  But Judge Sotomayor would sacrifice their claims to fair treatment in employment promotions to racial preferences and quotas.  The Supreme Court is now reviewing that decision.</p>
<p>She has an extremely high rate of her decisions being reversed, indicating that she is far more of a liberal activist than even the current liberal activist Supreme Court.</p></blockquote>
<p>Why would Republicans not dare to vote against her?  Is she the only Hispanic out there?  Doubt it!</p>
<p><tt><strong><tt><strong><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/15/us/15judge.html?pagewanted=print"><span style="color: red;">Sotomayor: 'I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male'...</span></a><br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/15/us/15sotomayor.html?_r=1"><span style="color: red;">Prospect's Résumé...</span></a><br />
<a href="http://wcbstv.com/topstories/obama.supreme.court.2.1019163.html"><span style="color: red;">Self described 'Newyorican'...</span></a><br />
<a href="http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=45d56e6f-f497-4b19-9c63-04e10199a085"><span style="color: red;">MAG: The Case Against...</span></a><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfC99LrrM2Q"><span style="color: red;">VIDEO:  Sotomayor on the court: 'Where policy is made'...</span></a></strong></tt></strong></tt></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rightvoices.com/2009/05/26/yes-nbc-republicans-would-dare-to-vote-against-this-hispanic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nazi guard suspect Demjanjuk deported to Germany</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2009/05/12/nazi-guard-suspect-demjanjuk-deported-to-germany/</link>
		<comments>http://rightvoices.com/2009/05/12/nazi-guard-suspect-demjanjuk-deported-to-germany/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 13:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[* sobibor death camp     * nazi guard john demjanjuk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=13846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nazi guard suspect Demjanjuk deported to Germany.
After three decades of fighting in court, suspected Nazi guard John Demjanjuk was deported from the United States to Germany on Tuesday to face allegations of being an accessory to the murder of 29,000 Jews and others at the Sobibor death camp.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090512/ap_on_re_eu/eu_demjanjuk">Nazi guard suspect Demjanjuk deported to Germany</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>After <span id="lw_1242130971_0" class="yshortcuts">three decades</span> of fighting in court, suspected <span id="lw_1242130971_1" class="yshortcuts">Nazi guard John Demjanjuk</span> was deported from the United States to Germany on Tuesday to face allegations of being an accessory to the murder of 29,000 Jews and others at the <span id="lw_1242130971_2" class="yshortcuts">Sobibor death camp</span>.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rightvoices.com/2009/05/12/nazi-guard-suspect-demjanjuk-deported-to-germany/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court &#8211; Feds Can&#8217;t Use ID Theft Law Against Illegal Immigrants</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2009/05/10/supreme-court-feds-cant-use-id-theft-law-against-illegal-immigrants/</link>
		<comments>http://rightvoices.com/2009/05/10/supreme-court-feds-cant-use-id-theft-law-against-illegal-immigrants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 04:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Illegal immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLORES-FIGUEROA v. UNITED STATES]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=13838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Supreme Court &#8211; Feds Can&#8217;t Use ID Theft Law Against Illegal Immigrants chad.
A unanimous Supreme Court ruled Monday the government has been overstepping the boundaries of identity theft legislation when targeting immigrants who use phony citizenship documents to acquire jobs.
source

A couple of thoughts:
1.  So working in a steel mill is now considered work that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://minx.cc/?post=287085">Supreme Court &#8211; Feds Can&#8217;t Use ID Theft Law Against Illegal Immigrants chad</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>A unanimous Supreme Court ruled Monday the government has been overstepping the boundaries of identity theft legislation when targeting immigrants who use phony citizenship documents to acquire jobs.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/05/supreme-court-feds-abusing-identity-theft-law/">source</a></p></blockquote>
<div class="commentText">
<p>A couple of thoughts:</p>
<p>1.  So working in a steel mill is now considered work that American’s won’t do?</p>
<p>2. The illegal alien knows they need a SS card, they just don’t know that you get the card at a federal building and not a street corner?</p>
<p><strong>See Also:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/10/us-identity-the.html#previouspost">US Identity Theft Convictions Increase 26 Percent, Feds</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rightvoices.com/2009/05/10/supreme-court-feds-cant-use-id-theft-law-against-illegal-immigrants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SOWELL: &#8216;Empathy&#8217; versus law</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2009/05/09/sowell-empathy-versus-law/</link>
		<comments>http://rightvoices.com/2009/05/09/sowell-empathy-versus-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 12:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NObama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=13812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SOWELL: &#8216;Empathy&#8217; versus law &#8211; Washington Times.
Read it and pass it on!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/09/empathy-versus-law/">SOWELL: &#8216;Empathy&#8217; versus law &#8211; Washington Times</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Read it and pass it on!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rightvoices.com/2009/05/09/sowell-empathy-versus-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Groups push for first gay Supreme Court justice</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2009/05/05/groups-push-for-first-gay-supreme-court-justice/</link>
		<comments>http://rightvoices.com/2009/05/05/groups-push-for-first-gay-supreme-court-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 03:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Souter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=13759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Groups push for first gay Supreme Court justice &#8211; Josh Gerstein &#8211; POLITICO.com.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22106.html">Groups push for first gay Supreme Court justice &#8211; Josh Gerstein &#8211; POLITICO.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rightvoices.com/2009/05/05/groups-push-for-first-gay-supreme-court-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
